@NateSilver538 agreed
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Absent data, it's vapid punditry. If he's going to present this argument,
@NateSilver538 should show his work & quantify properly.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
she doesn't get an extra mitt-by-association?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hillary is 3x as corrupt as Romney? ok.
-
Not corrupt but doing things that merit scrutiny
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
this is not insightful in the least
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NateSilver538 Mitt was personally solid, but his campaign was largely lies & bad faith = 4 MittsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NateSilver538 Yes, I'd say Clinton is a 3 Mitt, & Trump's a 50. Both treated as 5s but I'd settle for even a 15/5 DT/HRC ratio.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NateSilver538 He's given pass by his people for being "civilian." Almost like there's no limit to depravity, as long as non-govt. -
"Yeah he ripped people off, but didn't rip THE people off."
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.