I didn't draw any conclusions. I can make observations without therefore being tethered to some predictive conclusion
-
-
Replying to @mtracey @DougHenwood
Well, you're not making predictive conclusion but you are saying its a sign of lack of enthusiasm.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
I don't think it's controversial that the universe of passionate Hillary supporters is limited.
2 replies 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @DougHenwood @mtracey
Maybe. We actually know very little about Hillary supporters - receive less attention than Trump or Sanders supporters
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Studying the supporters of the status quo isn't very compelling.
5 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @DougHenwood @mtracey
Clinton supporters include overwhelming majority of People of color & those who make less than $50,000.
8 replies 1 retweet 15 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Overall estimates depend on whether you're including nonvoters or not. If you are, it's not as clear cut.
@DougHenwood@mtracey1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BenSpielberg @HeerJeet
I did some share estimates among registered voters here: https://34justice.com/2016/08/28/privilege-many-jill-stein-voters-have-it-and-many-hillary-clinton-voters-do-too/ ….
@DougHenwood@mtraceypic.twitter.com/lTpIQ4PaLA
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BenSpielberg @HeerJeet
In the piece from
@discomfiting I link, she references Reuters data on the population including nonvoters.@DougHenwood@mtracey1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
??? So a very large plurality of non-heterosexuals as a whole and an overwhelming majority of those who actually vote.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
She's most favored but she isn't supported by a overwhelmingly majority. 50% polled aren't considered likely voters.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.