Did UChicago "ban" anything? "Forbid" any prof? They don't support it. Calling that an "attack" is hysterical.https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/768846960577040384 …
-
-
Replying to @ScottGreenfield
Imagine being an untenured professor & wanting to have trigger warning with Dean saying it is form of censorship.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Dean didn't call trigger warnings censorship. Not seeing any issue w. prof doing as they please, but not forced into it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ScottGreenfield
Read the letter. Dean linked trigger warnings in sequence with censorship (disinviting speaker, safe spaces).
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
.
@HeerJeet Do you see where the dean calls trigger warnings censorship? Perhaps you can point it out to me?pic.twitter.com/DgQa0ukrxR
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ScottGreenfield
Placing trigger warning in company of cancelling invited speaker should be a clue!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Scott Greenfield Retweeted FIRE
I think we're already past that. UChicago has already said there's no ban.https://twitter.com/TheFIREorg/status/768907592986923009 …
Scott Greenfield added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Even if no ban you have admin taking stance on a pedagogical decision that belongs to profs. That's infringement of a.f.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
The admins job is to decide school policy. This isn't an a.f. issue. Never was, Still isn't.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.