not seeing how this will "limit free speech"https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/768846960577040384 …
-
-
Replying to @seanb44
Imagine you are an untenured professor and want to design a course that has a trigger warning.
9 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
And then, in turn, imagine you are an untenured professor and want to teach a course without using trigger warnings.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @red_boxer0 @Popehat
There is no university or college in America that requires trigger warnings in classes. You are afraid of a phantom.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The funny thing about what you just said is that it isn't at all related to what you're replying to.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @red_boxer0 @Popehat
??? Your scenario only makes sense if there were mandatory trigger warnings.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
.
@HeerJeet@red_boxer0 So "support" is not scary but "do not support" is scary?1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @Popehat @red_boxer0
??? who is saying support? Position is it should be up to professors, not administration.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Quick recap: Hat is wonders how your rule applies in a parallel universe where UChi said they "support" trigger warnings
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
But for that record, that hypothetical letter in that parallel universe would also be wrong.
-
-
it's really remarkable how little you can actually say without stifling free expression
0 replies 1 retweet 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.