not seeing how this will "limit free speech"https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/768846960577040384 …
??? Your scenario only makes sense if there were mandatory trigger warnings.
-
-
I literally took your hypothetical and reversed the words.
-
Did you see the part where I said "in turn"? It means, read
@Popehat's tweet, *then* mine follows it logically. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
.
@HeerJeet@red_boxer0 So "support" is not scary but "do not support" is scary? -
??? who is saying support? Position is it should be up to professors, not administration.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
trigger warnings aren't forbidden either: your scenario only makes sense if "do not support" > "supports" on an incentives scale
-
Not forbidden, just warned against in a letter than links them to censorship that violates core university principles!
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.