You are wasting lots of time commenting on an article you haven't read in a magazine you don't read. Also displaying ignorance.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
Og course I'm wasting time I'm talking to a jackass that can't focus on what the issue is I'm addressing. Don't care about ur link
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiniVanJones
The issue you are addressing makes no sense. Giuliani made a disgustingly false statement, whatever the context.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Yeah. Why don't you just go back to ur own disgusting insistance on pretending & tweeting then mayor of NY ignores 9/11 happened?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiniVanJones
Read Giuliani's sentence again. Even with your low level reading skills, meaning should be clear.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Yes, and everyone keep pretending like Giuliani didn't just mention 9/11 prior to that sentence Mr Reading Skills focuses on.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiniVanJones
How difficult is this to understand? He mentioned 9/11 but then for purposes of bashing Obama forgot 9/11 happened.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Haha...Ah yes. Welcome back intellectual dishonesty for political purposes. I've missed you so.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiniVanJones
You are ignoring the clear, simple meaning of Giuliani's statement. That's the true intellectual dishonesty.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
If Giuliani was a Democrat, his wording would be unassailable regarding 9/11. And you know it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
??? It would be false if he were the Pope or Dalai Lama. He said something profoundly untrue and idiotic.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.