The real danger is the opposite--that he would irrationally and w/o provocation start tossing around soldiers and (nuclear) bombs.
-
-
-
Clinton's more likely to do that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The NYTimes disagrees with
@heerjeet on Trump saying he wants to bring troops back to America.https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/759752625994727425 … -
Trump can't get to the end of a sentence without contradicting himself. Has promised closing bases, and having troops seize oil. 1/2
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
How is that so? As you've noted, he's paleo-con.
-
He's no ideologue. He's an impulsive, ignorant opportunist. His sympathies may be one way, but he can easily sway toward another.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Only a "delusion" if we are supposed to not believe what Trump actually says.
-
If you think you can believe a single word Trump says, then yes you are delusional.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He wants to use them to make money. If anything, that would result in less likelihood of pulling out.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
possible. But we know what Clinton will do overseas.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.