did a quick read when you asked. Wall Street protests were classic civil disobedience. Preventing mass was illiberal
-
-
-
-
Replying to @AkivaMCohen
Your preference is that gays continue to die while government remained indifferent, as under Reagan?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
no. My preference is that people don't commit assault to make political points
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AkivaMCohen @HeerJeet
you realize anti-abortion protesters could ape your rhetoric with as much self justification?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AkivaMCohen
Um, not only could they, they do. They practise civil disobedience all the time.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
and were they to throw blood at politicians, you'd have no problem with that? Because I sure as hell would
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AkivaMCohen
Right: on your principles you'd have to oppose most social justice movements in human history.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
no. Just some of their tactics. Ends do not justify means. That way lies horrors like suicide bombs
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Somehow or other ACT-UP, civil rights movement & suffragettes managed to avoid suicide bombings.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.