generally ok, though the stop the church action crossed the line (from what I've read)
-
-
Replying to @AkivaMCohen
ACT-UP did far more intrusive civil disobedience than BLM. Why don't you denounce them as bullies?
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
had they, and I been older than 12 in the 80s, I would have. But more intrusive than shutting down a parade?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
did a quick read when you asked. Wall Street protests were classic civil disobedience. Preventing mass was illiberal
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
-
Replying to @AkivaMCohen
Your preference is that gays continue to die while government remained indifferent, as under Reagan?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
no. My preference is that people don't commit assault to make political points
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AkivaMCohen @HeerJeet
you realize anti-abortion protesters could ape your rhetoric with as much self justification?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Um, not only could they, they do. They practise civil disobedience all the time.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
and were they to throw blood at politicians, you'd have no problem with that? Because I sure as hell would
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AkivaMCohen
Right: on your principles you'd have to oppose most social justice movements in human history.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.