ACT-UP did far more intrusive civil disobedience than BLM. Why don't you denounce them as bullies?
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
had they, and I been older than 12 in the 80s, I would have. But more intrusive than shutting down a parade?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
did a quick read when you asked. Wall Street protests were classic civil disobedience. Preventing mass was illiberal
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
-
Replying to @AkivaMCohen
Your preference is that gays continue to die while government remained indifferent, as under Reagan?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
no. My preference is that people don't commit assault to make political points
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AkivaMCohen
So: ACT-UP were bullies. A fair summary of your position?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
no. I don't know enough about them to say. But some of their conduct was bullying
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Wait: you are confident that BLM are bullies. But ACT-UP used more extreme tactics. So why not say they are bullies?
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
I am confident that the black Toronto members who shut down the parade were bullies. The movement as a whole? No
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.