We need to get HA Goodman in here to set him straight
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
More proof that Ralph Nader 2000 did as much to define grammar of modern electoral politics as he did consumer protection in 60s
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks for the link, more sure than ever I'm going to settle4her! PS I made the conscious decision not to turn that into a hashtag
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When you lose Noam Chomsky ...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@EricKleefeld@Kathy__Gee@JGHalle Looks like@mtaibbi has a better argument than Noam Chomsky. http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/ralph-nader-bernie-sanders-lesser-evilism-20160620 … -
Same argument: "That DT is monstrous sound formula 4 making ballot-box decisions."
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
fun hyperbole, but he's been saying this for a long time, nothing to do with this election: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/the-real-news/chomsky-in-swing-states-v_b_136248.html …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.