I hate him because he put me in a position of defending Gawker.
-
-
-
You don't have to defend Gawker. It's possible to see this as Chaotic Evil vs Lawful Evil.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Is Thiel simply an anti-Rupert Murdoch?
@DavidAllenGreen What Murdoch does with his media, Thiel does with the law: street justiceThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If we had different libel/slander/privacy laws, Thiel and Gawker would have settled it back in 2007? (1/3)
-
you may be underestimating Hogan. He lost everything, over 40 years of work Reputation shattered, for a private conversation.(2/3)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The lawyers who allowed Thiel to commandeer the suit may have violated ethical rules, see MRPC 1.8(f). http://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_1_8_current_clients_specific_rules.html …
-
Uh. What? Is there evidence of a lack of informed consent?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@NewRepublic The ACLU and NAACP in fact take their causes/vendettas quite personally, for reasons not always public.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hard to know what constitutes "justice" in this case w/o more info. I'll defer to the victims here.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So who pissed in his cheerios?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.