Sullivan is just an odd mish-mash of a pundit, isn't he? Is he really identifiable as one movement or another?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We've been shamelessly inflaming the base for 30 years, but it's democracy's fault when they go out of our control
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Everyone wants someone else to do introspection. McMegan does more introspection in a day than you do in a year.
-
??? McArdle strikes me as one of the least self-reflective political writer I've ever read.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I mean they never really were full throated defenders of democracy to begin with were they?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sullivan wrote on his blog all the time about the pernicious effects of GOP trash talk.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
in fairness, Sullivan was fairly clear-eyed on the origins of Trumpism on @prime_concernshttps://newrepublic.com/article/133299/primary-concerns-episode-12-andrew-sullivan-says-trump-will-ruin-us-right …
-
True! I thought that was much better than the New York article.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Andrew Sullivan, a "conservative"? In 2016? LOLOL.
-
Philosophically conservative, yes. Being philosophically conservative is not the same as being Republic or being right-wing.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.