But in condemning MDB you are acting as if his thinking is unique or exceptional & not widely shared
There's a distinction between reprehensible ideas and factually wrong claims.
-
-
everything is both alike and disalike. the question is why the disimilarity is salient.
-
I get that one is a factual assertion and one is normative. Why only care about wrong factual claims?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.