Nope. It's freshman philosophy 101 logic and convinces nobody of anything.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not to mention, the logic is faulty
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I mostly agree, but I think it's an excellent approach to use for dealing with, do we have free will or not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's also disprovable through pretty simple logic.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, but I have a friend who specialises in Pascal, who might have a more generous explanation for a dodgy approach to spirituality
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hell no. I'm an agnostic, and it strikes me as a specious bit of logical nonsense to shame people into what Is Not Faith, anyway.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
nonsensical anyway. Pretending doesn't equal faith, and I don't think you can trick God otherwise
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
how so? The wager is only a defense against God of the Gaps or "why not?" arguments, right?
-
it is not applicable for example in circumstances where ppl believe they receive revelation directly from the divine
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
you'd think so, but real-existing religious people often expressly rely on it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.