1. Globe and Mail's defence of Wente is she's sloppy, not a plagiarist. That suggests way out of this mess: http://www.j-source.ca/article/globe-and-mail-editor-chief-%E2%80%9Csloppy-standards%E2%80%9D-where-they-found-issues-wente …
-
-
6. So Wente was able to make a lucrative career by rehashing what she read in NY Times & WSJ, since few Globe readers read those.
-
@HeerJeet This is what I tell my students: It's easier than ever to plagiarize. And easier than ever to get caught.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@HeerJeet In other words, her whole career was probably based on plagiarism. But now we have the technology to catch her. -
@LeoMcKayJr@HeerJeet Right. But it's not due to her age or when she started her career, it's due to her plagiarism.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@HeerJeet Good grief. How come she's the exception then? No one else in Canadian journalism is plagiarizing..oh sorry, "sloppy".Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet She also had the "right" politics so she gets away with a lot more.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.