10. Where have the Heideggers & Eliots gone? Good question but But Douthat's answer (chased out of academia by liberals) not sufficient
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
11. The great early 20th century reactionaries (Heidegger etc.) flourished because they had a social/political base.
2 replies 3 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
12. European right of early 20th century included both aristocrats (von Papen) & populist thugs (you know who). Heidegger fit in that space
4 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
13. A Heidegger or an Ezra Pound could provide intellectual gloss to movements that still had some pretence to intellectual ambition.
3 replies 4 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
14. Far right movements now more purely populist & don't seek intellectual justification. Mussolini cultivated Pound. Trump mocks eggheads
19 replies 11 retweets 34 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
15. I didn't carry my twitter essay on
@DouthatNYT & reactionary mind to its logical conclusion, so bear with me.1 reply 3 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
16. Twosided problem with Douthat's position is he sees liberalism as optimistic & reactionaries as offering salutary pessimistic corrective
2 replies 4 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
17. Liberalism begins with doubt about virtue-creating regimes. It's built on pessimism, on "low but solid ground" (Strauss)
2 replies 4 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
18. Reactionaries, conversely, are not really pessimistic but rather romantic egotist insanely confident about ability to remake world.
3 replies 6 retweets 22 likes
@michaelbd Waugh is fascinating in his contradictions because his deflationary satiric art helped balance his reactionary instincts.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.