@HeerJeet @charlescwcooke historically, the Senate has given deference to the President's choice regardless of ideology. See: Scalia.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet@charlescwcooke Bork was too problematic even for some Republicans but generally they sail through.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
@acebb20@charlescwcooke@HeerJeet Not a professor of law, but a lecturer taught one course, highly critical of the Constitution
End of conversation
-
-
-
@HeerJeet@charlescwcooke article 1, section 5 is still a thing, right?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet@charlescwcooke More strongly infers President should request list of acceptable nominees from Senate.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would seem to require != must.
@HeerJeet@charlescwcookeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet@charlescwcooke They're in the "advise" stage right now. It's up to the president to weigh that advice before proceeding.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet@charlescwcooke Does the requirement of consent to sex require a woman to take serious consideration of all propositions? -
@HeerJeet@charlescwcooke What if she's a lesbian? Is a priori rejection of men invalid? - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.