@cselley That article, along with others, minimized Pinochet's crime, acting as a de facto defence attorney. I have a problem with that.
-
-
Replying to @BrennanField
@BrennanField@cselley It's strange to criticize people for fetishizing Norway if your paper in past fetishized Pinochet's Chile.5 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
-
Replying to @cselley
@cselley@BrennanField Only drunk on my love of reading old National Post editorials.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@BrennanField Does your "don't mock anything that might conflict with employer's entire editorial history" policy apply to TNR?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cselley
@cselley@BrennanField All I'd like to see is for Post to do something similar with its own history.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@BrennanField I'd probably be more compelled if you had shown me more than one bad editorial and Luiza's non-scandalous report.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cselley
@cselley@BrennanField Sigh. To lay out case would require me researching and writing an essay, not just a set of tweets.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@cselley@BrennanField putting in the effort to back up a bold assertion? An impossible ask, for sure.2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
@a_picazo @cselley @BrennanField I think the editorial I cited more than made my point, to be honest.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@a_picazo@BrennanField You're being remarkably ridiculous. If one bad editorial condemns a publication, they're all condemned.2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @cselley
@cselley@HeerJeet@BrennanField Also curious: Does that one editorial cited = the spate claimed? Is more coming, or.... is that it?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.