4. We can appreciate the exact nature of Mill's "benevolent" imperialism by reading him on the Irish potato famine: http://crookedtimber.org/2016/01/28/millian-liberalism-and-the-irish-famine/ …
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
5. As
@henryfarrell notes, Mill's response to famine was "to contemn in the harshest terms efforts to help" people starving to death1 reply 6 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
6. The key fact to remember is that famine was man-made and relief (feeding the starving) was very feasible if government wanted to do it.
4 replies 8 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
7. C. O’Grada: Although potato crop failed, [Ireland] was still producing and exporting more than enough grain crops to feed the population.
3 replies 3 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
8. Fact that Mill had a more cogent & enlightened critique than most of causes of famine (in landlord system) makes his stance even worse.
3 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
9. Mill understood famine was systematic failure not caused by Irish peasants but still wanted them to suffer (for the greater good)
3 replies 3 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
10. Everything I've said about Mill & Ireland applies even more to India, overwhich he was a key policy maker for many years.
1 reply 3 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
11. Aside from the famine stuff, Mill was actually less democratically inclined on India than others (including his father) had been.
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
12. On India, Mills *unlike his dad) preferred working with local hereditary elites rather than setting up democratic institutions.
2 replies 2 retweets 9 likes
-
- Show replies
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.