1. I've been nursing a grudge against this Adam Gopnik New Yorker essay on John Stuart Mill for about 8 years: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/10/06/right-again …
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
2. It's splendidly written (of course) & JS Mill was in many ways admirable figure who deserves to be celebrated. But it's also a whitewash
2 replies 3 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
3. According to Gopnik, Mill was "a servant of British imperialism, but a benevolent kind."
2 replies 3 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
4. We can appreciate the exact nature of Mill's "benevolent" imperialism by reading him on the Irish potato famine: http://crookedtimber.org/2016/01/28/millian-liberalism-and-the-irish-famine/ …
4 replies 12 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
5. As
@henryfarrell notes, Mill's response to famine was "to contemn in the harshest terms efforts to help" people starving to death1 reply 6 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
6. The key fact to remember is that famine was man-made and relief (feeding the starving) was very feasible if government wanted to do it.
4 replies 8 retweets 17 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
@donnellymin Very similar. British policy in India as well.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.