@NickNipclose @HeerJeet if the satire is so distilled that those it lampoons embrace it. and it requires explanation, maybe time for rethink
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @NickNipclose
@NickNipclose@RepStones Is it remotely possible that Jonathan Swift had more talent than the cartoonists for CH? Or is that unthinkable?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @NickNipclose
@NickNipclose@RepStones Talent is key to difference between us. I think it's fair to say CH is failed satire. That idea offends you.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @NickNipclose
@NickNipclose@RepStones I don't see how talent is irrelevant to question of how two works of art differ in effect they achieve.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @NickNipclose
@NickNipclose@RepStones Well, what is the point of the comparison? Why bring up Swift unless you think CH achieves a Swiftian effect?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
@NickNipclose @RepStones Isn't it possible that just as CH creates inept art you've composed a confusing tweet?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.