@NickNipclose Again, where is the slander in this?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @NickNipclose
@NickNipclose This analogy would work if pastor at that church had made statements that could plausibly be seen as racist.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @NickNipclose
@NickNipclose Charlie Hebdo's claim to be anti-racist compromised by inept art that trafficked in racism.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @NickNipclose
@NickNipclose Basically you want to shut down any discussion of Charlie Hebdo, it's politics, its art, intent, and how it is interpreted.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @NickNipclose
@NickNipclose Libel and slander are legal concepts. Not sure they serve any function here but to shut down discussion. It's a bully tactic.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
@NickNipclose I explained to you what the point of the analogy was. If you don't want to understand it, that's fine.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.