Subtext of both "unleash Chang" and "unleash Sharon/Netanyahu/Israel" is that USA junior allies are attack dogs.
-
-
-
@HeerJeet and that war and combat are good and beneficial things
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@Econ_Marshall@HeerJeet not liberal perfidy: establishment perfidy--it was Eisenhower and Truman who refused to "unleash Chiang" -
@delong@Econ_Marshall Yep. Another subtext is victory can be easily achieved if we had the will. Lots packed in these phrases. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@Econ_Marshall@HeerJeet Of course Chiang's non-unleashing continued through the Eisenhower years, to say nothing of Nixon 20 years later -
@Econ_Marshall@HeerJeet But who wants to take a breathless Hitler analogy away from these mouth breathers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's "unleash Chiang", not Chang. http://www.newrepublic.com/blog/timothy-noah/100205/marco-rubio-flunks-history …
@HeerJeetThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.