@bljacka @JodiKoberinski @StephenMarche Bottom line: is racism disqualifying or not?
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@JodiKoberinski@StephenMarche Well that goes back to my original point. You can't design your candidate. You have to choose.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bljacka
@HeerJeet@JodiKoberinski@StephenMarche You can "say" that X or Y is "disqualifying" but you easily can have before you a bad choice.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bljacka
@HeerJeet@JodiKoberinski@StephenMarche Candidates who you imagine are "disqualified" & some who aren't, but who you can't stand. So then?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bljacka
@HeerJeet@JodiKoberinski@StephenMarche Bottom line: nothing actually is "disqualifying"; there's better and worse. You're stuck w/choice.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bljacka
@HeerJeet@JodiKoberinski@StephenMarche You're free to "say" that X is "disqualifying" but you'll inevitably be forced to rationalize.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bljacka
@HeerJeet@JodiKoberinski@StephenMarche Not to mention that there are greater & lesser degrees of "racism". W/Man, it's not just "yes/no."1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bljacka
@HeerJeet@JodiKoberinski@StephenMarche Racism (broadly) is a universal vice, expressed in a myriad of ways. Don't imagine you're w/o sin.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bljacka
@bljacka@JodiKoberinski@StephenMarche "sin" is completely wrong framework. We are talking about public policy1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@JodiKoberinski@StephenMarche Well then you're asking wrong question: are you concerned w/what candidate thinks about "others"?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@bljacka @JodiKoberinski @StephenMarche You are one who brought up what candidates think and idea of "sin
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.