@HeerJeet Yes! That's the point. It's not about whether he'd step down -- unlikely -- it's about the party, which would remain!
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet Regression to the mean, or another mean-spirited regressive? The former is statistically more likely, but why risk it?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet That's not tangential, that's a serious question if you buy realpolitik. I'll leave it to Canadians to answer however.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet Baird. Brrrrr…Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet Another argument for not supporting that party. Globe can't argue that Harper is bad but party ok if next leader might be worseThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet Chances are good. (I.e., bad.)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet Yeah, I wish they'd expressed a preference for which specific future-Churchill Harper was holding back they wanted to take over.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet The big question to me is *who* would succeed him. WHO?! He centralized hold on power; there would be a huge vacuum afterwards.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet@tgayathiri Jason Kenney About the same..Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.