1. This Globe and Mail editorial is prime example of why I have a hard time taking the paper's editorials seriously: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/editorials/leap-manifesto-gets-poor-marks-for-timing-and-content-otherwise-fine/article26373885/ …
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
2. Fact: climate change is real. Fact: Canada is gaining international reputation as laggard in dealing with climate.
3 replies 12 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
3. Fact: none of the three major Canadian political parties has policies that are anywhere near serious enough on climate
3 replies 30 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @theturner
@theturner Are there any policies by 3 parties that would lead to carbon reduction at the level needed, according to scientific consensus?2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @theturner
@theturner Right, but Canada is lagging not just Scandinavia but Europe as a whole, the USA, China, etc.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @theturner
@theturner If the Globe offered capitalist alternative policies to the Leap on how to get carbon reduction, I wouldn't object to editorial.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@theturner Like I said, lots of grounds to criticize The Leap. But critique should acknowledge failure of mainstream politics.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.