1. This Globe and Mail editorial is prime example of why I have a hard time taking the paper's editorials seriously: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/editorials/leap-manifesto-gets-poor-marks-for-timing-and-content-otherwise-fine/article26373885/ …
-
-
@HeerJeet isn't Canada one of the handful of nations on Earth that would benefit from climate change? -
New conversation -
-
-
6. Unlike their star columnist Margaret Wente, Globe and Mail editors aren't climate change deniers. But they don't take problem seriously
-
7. But instead of grappling with climate change, Globe offers re-heated Red Scare rhetoric (Marxists! Maoists!) and guilt by association.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@HeerJeet I don't think Globe deemed props "not how we'd do it", rather "internally inconsistent" e.g. giving comfort to wind farm opponentsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.