"5 to 15 percent of the men on birth certificates are not the biological fathers of their children" --http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/07/who-s-your-daddy/305969/ …
-
-
Replying to @carloshasanax
@HeerJeet If memory serves, the rate is usually less than 5%, the highest ~10% in a 1970s London housing project.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @carloshasanax
@carloshasanax Sure, it varies from communities. But still, higher than what people think.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @carloshasanax
@carloshasanax Fair enough it's better to have a more accurate #. I assumed Atlantic Monthly (my source) would be accurate.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @carloshasanax
@HeerJeet But it's low, usually less than one in twenty, and often closer to one in fifty. Some cases due to chimera, secret adoptions, etc.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @carloshasanax
@HeerJeet It's an obnoxious non-fact, & whenever I see it, I wonder about the psychosexual motivations of the author. Easy to find real nos.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@carloshasanax Do you have a link to better #? Because what I found online tended to be more extreme than Atlantic #s.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet Sure. Anderson's 2006 meta-analysis finds a range of 0.4% to 11.8%, largest sample n=6960, rate=2.1% http://www.anth.uconn.edu/degree_programs/ecolevo/kermyt.pdf …2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @carloshasanax
@carloshasanax 0.4 to 11.8 still seems high to me!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.