Lincoln> Grant>TR>Ike>Ford>Bush 1> McKinley>Arthur>Harrison>Garfield>Taft>Harding>Coolidge> Reagan >Hoover > Hayes>Bush II>Nixon
@notjessewalker Basically Alex Cockburn's argument. Ford did least damage. There's some truth to that.
-
-
@HeerJeet Not just did less damage, but *could* do less damage, even with people like Kissinger and Cheney on staff with their agendas. -
@HeerJeet Oppositional movements could push further, had more room to maneuver. In retrospect it was a pretty amazing historical moment.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.