4. So his job is to stave off change. To keep Palestinians in deep freeze & to ally with the status quo powers (Saudi Arabia, Sisi in Egypt)
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
5. There's a certain logic to Netanyahu's status quo bias. Most change in region has been for the worse.
15 replies 5 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
6. Worth noting too that despite disagreement over Iran, USA shares much same status quo agenda: Saudi Arabia, Sisi in Egypt. etc.
2 replies 5 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
7. The difference between Obama/USA position and Netanyahu/Israel position is thus a subtle one, although still real.
5 replies 3 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
8. Obama/USA is pro-status quo but also thinks on some issues (Iran nukes, Palestinians) negotiations needed because status quo untenable.
2 replies 3 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
9. Netanyahu/Israel position is that status quo can be held on to as long as possible.
3 replies 4 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
10. We should acknowledge that the status quo in the occupation isn't static: it means building more settlements, more "facts on the ground"
5 replies 5 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
11. The problem with a status quo position is that that there are real pressures, real social forces, that make status quo untenable.
4 replies 3 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
12. As Obama rightly noted, there's nothing in current Iran status quo, even buttressed by bombings, to stop Iranian nukes. Only slow down
5 replies 2 retweets 4 likes
@dansblog1 Keeping sanctions on permanently requires international consensus that simply doesn't exist. It's a fantasy.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.