@HeerJeet Josh Rogin is no rogan josh.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet It was embarassing.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@heerjeet Nb@JoshRogin doesn't actually claim giving a soapbox to bogus talking points is journalism; he just sez that's all he knows to doThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet I don't think you know what the word hearsay means. This is 2 US Congressmen speaking on the record about a meeting they were at. -
@joshrogin@HeerJeet Um, no, that's exactly what hearsay means. Ask a lawyer.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@HeerJeet@reallyandrea@joshrogin You repeated what two US congressmen said they heard. So you repeated lies from a known dishonest source.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@LeftyBollocks@HeerJeet Clearly there are 2 parts that confuse you: that congressmen lied, that lies were printed because no verification.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@LeftyBollocks@HeerJeet If you're going to accuse other people of ignorance you should do some homework first. Arguing from dumb is boring.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet@joshrogin just because it isn't hearsay doesn't mean Josh is a credible witness, that he understood context, etc.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Jim_Hart@joshrogin@HeerJeet but that's not the case here. Josh is asserting the truth of what was (allegedly) said. Clearly inadmissible.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.