The New York Review of Books is of course a great place for book reviews. Has spottier record on doing actual journalism.
-
-
Replying to @littlestarmag
@littlestarmag@HeerJeet Guillermoprieto? de Bellaigue? McCarthy? Tomasky? maybe sweeping generalization is not the way to go here.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @aoscott
@aoscott@littlestarmag But the stories they've had which have fallen apart have done so spectacularly. EJ Epstein best example.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@aoscott@littlestarmag EJ Epstein! Guess that settles it!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @LiberalGood
@LiberalGood@aoscott@littlestarmag Scarry is a parallel case. Shows a certain propensity for offbeat theories/debunkings.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@aoscott@littlestarmag and bernstein's piece isn't as self-evidently flawed as you and your twitter mob has decreed1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LiberalGood
@LiberalGood@aoscott@littlestarmag Not self-evidently flawed but I thought Times' rejoinder was strong.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@LiberalGood@littlestarmag yes. not defending Bernstein's piece, just think you painted with too broad a brush.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@aoscott @LiberalGood @littlestarmag Things like Scarry and Epstein really stand out in part because rest of time NYRB is so good.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.