4. Read's comments parallel Nick Denton's complaint about "traumatizing" online hatred directed at Gawker writer Jordon Sargent.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
5. Denton isn't being contradictory since he came to conclude that piece outing Conde Nast executive was hurtful & should be taken down.
2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
6. But Read's position does seem odd -- Gawker has the right to be as nasty as it wants to be to others, but hurt by criticism of Gawker
6 replies 7 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
7. Gaweker staff position does seem to come down to: we have the right to be mean and you have to respect our feelings. Which is childish.
12 replies 15 retweets 43 likes -
Replying to @tomscocca
@HeerJeet On what evidence are you fluffing up one tweet into this diagnosis?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tomscocca
@tomscocca Read's memo but also way Gawker staffers have blocked people making reasonable, non-nasty critiques.1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @tomscocca
@tomscocca Was there a twitter pile-on on Thursday? Sure. But there were also reasonable critiques not engaged with.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@tomscocca There's no obligation but anyone who traffics in incendiary material looks better if they engage with reasonable critics.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.