Make no mistake: Christie Blatchford is an enabler of misogynist harassment: http://canadalandshow.com/article/christie-blatchford-worst …
-
-
Replying to @billdinYEG
@billdinYEG@HeerJeet One could seriously consider whether writing such a column needs to happen. Since they aren't charged with anything.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johnbowman
@johnbowman@billdinYEG Blatchford's choice of which complainants to believe tends to be highly selective, based on experience.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@johnbowman we'll know when the verdict comes down. Right now, we have Anne Theriault's piece for @CDNLND, which is problematic.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @billdinYEG
@billdinYEG@HeerJeet "We'll know when the verdict comes"? Cmon. We'll know whether the court finds him guilty. That's all.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johnbowman
@johnbowman@HeerJeet I covered courts early in my career. A well-written verdict by a judge summarizes the evidence supporting his finding.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @billdinYEG
@billdinYEG@HeerJeet Right. But if the defendant is found not guilty, doesn't mean complainants were lying. High burden of proof not met.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@johnbowman @billdinYEG Exactly. Courts are not there to decide the truth but rather whether evidence meets burden of law.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@johnbowman And part of the court's assessment in this case will likely be how it saw Guthrie & Reilly as witnesses.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.