@MazMHussain @HeerJeet I said existential enemy not threat
-
-
Replying to @StephenMarche
@StephenMarche@MazMHussain@HeerJeet Is there a functional difference?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LornestoToledo
@LornestoToledo@StephenMarche@MazMHussain So, an existential enemy but not existential threat, so main danger is harsh Iranian words.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @StephenMarche
@StephenMarche I'm trying to imagine a scenario where Iranian leaders decide to use their paltry arsenal on USA have entire nation wiped out3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet Ah yes, the Iranian revolution's famous common sense and love of its people. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1hkQtuwV38 …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StephenMarche
@StephenMarche Yglesias is very good on the bizarre logic that because Iran is bad we shouldn't negotiate: http://www.vox.com/2015/7/15/8973111/iran-nuclear-deal-eli-lake …1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @StephenMarche
@StephenMarche Inspection regime with snapbacks is a gain. Your proposed alternatives would negate.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@StephenMarche You do understand that your position (continued sanctions) means end of negotiations & thus same result?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.