Was there a 20th century American intellectual who was more consistently wrong about everything than James Burnham?
-
-
@HeerJeet I was about to say "Bill Kristol, but his wrongness straddles the centuries"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet that's actually one of the reasons he is wrong so often: functional innumeracy.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet you said intellectual, not shillThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet Paul Ehrlich? -
@nlgraham1 Okay, that's a good example. Although Burnham shared Ehrlich's Malthusianism, so might still win! - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@HeerJeet Because he's 21st-c., or because he is un-intellectual? -
@polyparadigm Not an intellectual. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.