10. The point I'm making is a simple one: this is a fairly complicated issue so it's worth going to informed sources, not instant experts.
-
-
Replying to @dick_nixon
@dick_nixon Complexity is how we judge Charlie Hebdo. Are they like Pam Geller or are they something else.4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@dick_nixon So it would be OK for someone to kill you because of disagreement with your belief? Jeet Heer for Prime Minister.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dmking316
@dmking316@dick_nixon You have serious reading comprehension problems.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@dick_nixon I don't comprehend any excuse for terror. Anything short of outright condemnation of terror encourages terror.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dmking316
@dmking316 I happen to think CH isn't racist, but it's a perfectly legitimate topic to argue over, and separate from killings themselves.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dmking316
@dmking316 In fact curtailing our criticism of CH after attack means we're letting terrorists shape how we talk and think.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@dmking316 Some of the critics don't understand context but others know much more than you or I (Art Goldhammer for example)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.