@aujangabadi @NathanielGivens Return to demographic not natural but driven by Rabid Puppies slate.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens all as sexism, but the fact is that there was a statistically sig., unexplained trend in recent years. (2/2)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aujangabadi
@aujangabadi@NathanielGivens I reject the idea that women doing well in awards is inherently sinister or suspect.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens any reversion is rolling back progressive gains in SF. While RP is repugnant, convergence to demo is not. (2/2)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aujangabadi
@aujangabadi@NathanielGivens You can't dissociate reversion from actions & ideology of RP. That's just a bad faith argument.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens And you can't assume that 50% representation of a 20% demo is not also an anomaly.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aujangabadi
@aujangabadi@NathanielGivens Real anomaly is 80% domination of field by demo that is 50% of population (men).7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens If SF was 50-50 and Hugo was 80-20 for extended period, then we would both agree that sexism was at play.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aujangabadi
@aujangabadi@NathanielGivens No, we would not agree on that. As Delany example shows, statistical anomalies can happen.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens And then, in the next year, it reverted to 80-20 again. Would any of this be sexist?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@aujangabadi @NathanielGivens This hypothetical ignores crucial context of real world (historical sexism of field & Rabid Puppies ideology)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.