@aujangabadi @NathanielGivens There's no reason to think that.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens around a mean, but the results of past few years are *far* beyond typical SD. (2/2)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aujangabadi
@aujangabadi@NathanielGivens Samuel Delany was only black writer of SFF in 1960s (less than 1% of field). He had more than 1% impact.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens And yet he fits the demographic model. How many Hugos did he win, %-wise? He's within SD of demos. (1/2)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aujangabadi
@aujangabadi@NathanielGivens He started publishing 1965. But 1970 he had 4 nominations and 2 wins. In field where he was only black.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens Do the math. 2 wins in 5 years out of ~10 awards per year. So 2/50, or ~4% representation. Well within bounds.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aujangabadi
@aujangabadi@NathanielGivens 10 awards per year for writing fiction? (He wouldn't have been eligible for fan awards).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens NG's chart shows total dist. of Hugos across gender. I did the same wrt Delaney.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aujangabadi
@aujangabadi@NathanielGivens You assumed there were 10 Hugo winners in fiction per year in 1960s. That's just not true.7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens If women are 20% of submitting authors and 50% of awards, that is *huge* over-representation--statistically sig.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@aujangabadi @NathanielGivens This is an absurd argument.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.