@aujangabadi @HeerJeet @NathanielGivens This is political argument with added numbers and not serious analysis. Not that there’s any problem
-
-
Replying to @henryfarrell
@aujangabadi@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens as such with political argument+numbers - but I think@HeerJeet is quite right not to take it as1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
@aujangabadi@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens dispositive, or anything like dispositive.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
@henryfarrell@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens I think that Heer made it much more political than NG did. NG was very measured in his (1/2)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aujangabadi
@aujangabadi@henryfarrell@NathanielGivens NG was measured in arguing Hugos dominated by Marxists, Feminist SJWs? Please.3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@henryfarrell@NathanielGivens Contrast with "Science Fiction's White Boys' Club Strikes Back". Who do YOU think is more measured?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aujangabadi
@aujangabadi@henryfarrell@NathanielGivens "measured" is mark of rhetoric, not of accuracy. Frederick Douglass not "measured" on slavery.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@henryfarrell@NathanielGivens unilaterally advance it as the only true or "accurate" one. (2/2)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aujangabadi
@aujangabadi@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens The unqualified assertions about feminist/Marxist/take-no-prisonerSJWs undermine your claim.11 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
@henryfarrell@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens and RP sexism. (Ironic because NG states that to someone like Heer, it would be). (2/2)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@aujangabadi @henryfarrell @NathanielGivens Nathaniel's "restraint" amounts to an handwaving away the historical sexism of the field.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.