@aujangabadi @NathanielGivens You're assuming that the purpose of these Hugo nominees is to challenge sexism rather than honor fine work.
@aujangabadi @NathanielGivens You assumed there were 10 Hugo winners in fiction per year in 1960s. That's just not true.
-
-
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens No, I am assuming that 10 Hugos were awarded *period*. (Which was wrong, it was 6 during the 60s.)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens The point here being that the statistical disconnect then and now are nowhere near equivalent.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens If women are 20% of submitting authors and 50% of awards, that is *huge* over-representation--statistically sig. -
@aujangabadi@NathanielGivens This is an absurd argument.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens It is entirely possible that the women were simply better writers than men during that period, but a return (1/2)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens to demographic dist. of Hugos would not, in and of itself, be indicative of any sexism. (2/2) -
@aujangabadi@NathanielGivens Return to demographic not natural but driven by Rabid Puppies slate. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens Delaney, on the other hand, is a textbook statistical outlier. He is one data sample with, as you yourself (1/2)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens stated, enormous impact. (2/2)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.