@aujangabadi @HeerJeet @NathanielGivens The rest of the analysis - as far as I can see - is observation that most F/SF writers are male ...
-
-
Replying to @henryfarrell
@aujangabadi@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens and some rather dubious claims about the relationship between Marxism, feminism and SJWs.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
@aujangabadi@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens This is political argument with added numbers and not serious analysis. Not that there’s any problem1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
@aujangabadi@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens as such with political argument+numbers - but I think@HeerJeet is quite right not to take it as1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
@aujangabadi@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens dispositive, or anything like dispositive.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
@henryfarrell@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens I think that Heer made it much more political than NG did. NG was very measured in his (1/2)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aujangabadi
@aujangabadi@henryfarrell@NathanielGivens NG was measured in arguing Hugos dominated by Marxists, Feminist SJWs? Please.3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@henryfarrell@NathanielGivens Contrast with "Science Fiction's White Boys' Club Strikes Back". Who do YOU think is more measured?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aujangabadi
@aujangabadi@HeerJeet is indeed making his own argument. But his entirely correct point is that@NathanielGivens piece not some objective1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
@aujangabadi@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens social scientific assessment of the pros and cons. It is an explicitly political argument.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@henryfarrell @aujangabadi @NathanielGivens Exactly.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.