@HeerJeet Really disappointed in your NewRepublic article. You lifted N. Givens' charts without presenting any of his nuance.
-
-
Replying to @aujangabadi
Thanks,
@aujangabadi Sadly,@HeerJeet's approach is pretty typical. All outrage. No substance. Disappointing take on important issue.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NathanielGivens
@NathanielGivens@aujangabadi In general, I though Nathaniel ignored the actual history of racism/sexism in SF, which I tried to fill in.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens The Goodreads assertion is a red herring. The demographics point (from Hugo dist and from Tor data) is key.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aujangabadi
@aujangabadi@NathanielGivens Demographic point just proves if you have a historically sexist field, fewer women will enter it. Hardly good.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens which women are encouraged to enter SF? Shouldn't that *be* the larger discussion? (2/2)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aujangabadi
@aujangabadi@NathanielGivens I'd say Sad & Rabid Puppies are using Hugos as venue for DISCOURAGING women & minorities from writing SFF.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@NathanielGivens N very clearly delineates between them, and mentions that Rabid Puppies is troubling. (2/2)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@aujangabadi @NathanielGivens Sad Puppies made de facto alliance with Rabid Puppies.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.