.@jcohencole @rebeccaonion @HeerJeet (1/2) The Becker-Friedman argument is not that markets break up discrimination but that anonymizing
-
-
Replying to @delong
.
@jcohencole@rebeccaonion@HeerJeet (2/2) bricks of discrimination. Very curious that neither better nor Friedman could see that...6 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @delong
@delong@rebeccaonion@HeerJeet isn't that Friedman saying markets drive out discrimination?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jcohencole
@jcohencole@delong@rebeccaonion@HeerJeet only if the discrimination is not related to econ efficiency which isn't always the case2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexzhao
@alexzhao@delong@rebeccaonion@HeerJeet I wasn't aware that Friedman had examples of when it is efficient to discriminate. Does he?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jcohencole
.
@jcohencole@alexzhao@rebeccaonion@HeerJeet wo/ anonymization it’s always efficient 2 discriminate *if consumers want a whites-only shop*3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @delong
@delong@jcohencole@alexzhao@rebeccaonion Which means you can't fight racism with just "the market" -- need collective action & laws1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@delong@alexzhao@rebeccaonion and I really don't recall Friedman making the argument for collective action1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jcohencole
@jcohencole@delong@alexzhao@rebeccaonion He supported Goldwater in 19641 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@delong@alexzhao@rebeccaonion because Goldwater was brave enough to say civil rights act was imposing on freedom2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@jcohencole @delong @alexzhao @rebeccaonion i.e. because Goldwater courted the white racist vote.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.