1. I want to talk a little bit about lapses in journalistic ethics in superhero comics. (With sidetour of anachronism in the genre).
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
Jeet Heer Retweeted Jeet Heer
2.
@attackerman, himself a terrific journalist, raises a key point about Ben Urich, the reporter in "Daredevil"https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/587049432794800128 …Jeet Heer added,
1 reply 5 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
3. Ben Urich is supposed to be a jaundiced but decent big city reporter in the Jimmy Breslin mold. Yet he's heavily relies on one source.
1 reply 4 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
4. RT
@attackerman BEN URICH! My favorite source-captured journalist!1 reply 3 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
5. For that matter how many scoops did Lois Lane & Jimmy ("Superman's Pal") Olson get because of connection to one source?
7 replies 6 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
6. Peter Parker is the worst of all: he creates news by fighting supervillians & sells the selfies. Highly ethically dubious.
13 replies 33 retweets 33 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
7. MT
@EricKleefeld And in early Lee/Ditko story, [Peter Parker] created fake photos of Spider-Man as criminal — Jameson wanted them.2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes
@tomscocca In real life, this would lead to a huge Jason Blair stink.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@tomscocca In recent Spider-Man comic, Peter gets caught and blacklisted as photog by Johan.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.