@1northofcenter Accuracy of "apartheid" as descriptor depends on whether occupation continues indefinitely or there is 2-state solution.
-
-
Replying to @1northofcenter
@heerjeet Not really apartheid if the minority refuses to have its own state, preferring instead to destroy the other state.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @1northofcenter
@heerjeet Lemme list them for you. 1) 1937 - Peel commission 2) 1947 - UN resolution. 3) 1949-1967 - Egypt and Jordan never est. a state.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @1northofcenter
@heerjeet 4) 1967 - Israel offered land back after 6-day war. Arabs at Khartoum refused. 5) 2000 Camp David 6) Taba Proposal 7) 2008 Clinton2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @1northofcenter
@1northofcenter Most of those are contestable. Fact is there have been rejectionists on both sides.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @1northofcenter
@heerjeet the stubbornness of the rejectionists on the Palestinian side is mindboggling. Too many convinced they'll be able 2 kill Israel.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @1northofcenter
@heerjeet One more fact: Failure to get a 2-state solution will be the end of Israel. Hard to believe Bibi is serious & not pandering.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @1northofcenter
@heerjeet But if you believe Bibi is real, and Iran's plans to destroy Israel are fake, then you're probably biased against Israel.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@1northofcenter I think it's best to judge people by their actions and capabilities.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.