4. Michael Mann & other climate scientists probably also have grounds to sue Post, but they (lucky for Post) have bigger things to deal with
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
5. The fact is, the Post's coverage of climate, particularly in op ed and Financial Post is scandalously bad and dishonest.
1 reply 8 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
6. Andrew Coyne, comments editor at Post, is on record as believing science on climate isn't settled. Is receptive to denialist voices.
2 replies 6 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @softgrasswalker
@softgrasswalker@HeerJeet no me who uses the word "deniers" is to be taken seriously.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SevenSharpNine
@SevenSharpNine@softgrasswalker Scientific consensus is AGW. If you deny that is happening, you are a denier. Simple.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@softgrasswalker as I said Jeet, you are anti-intellectual.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SevenSharpNine
@SevenSharpNine@softgrasswalker Support of peer-reviewed science is an odd way to be anti-intellectual.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
@HeerJeet@softgrasswalker ignoring dissenting voices is anti-intellectual.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@SevenSharpNine @softgrasswalker If those dissenting voices want to claim to be doing science they need to publish peer-reviewed work.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.