4. America is a superpower, Israel is dependent client state. Clients don't usually tell superpowers what to do.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
5. USA has traditionally given Israel wide sway on the Palestinian issue but not on wider Middle East (i.e Reagan selling arms to Saudis)
1 reply 5 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
6. Israel has traditionally depended upon a bi-partisan consensus in USA, which Netanyahu's actions are fraying.
1 reply 4 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
7. Moreover, by trying to humiliate this president, Netanyahu is alienating a major voting block in Democratic party, African-Americans.
4 replies 6 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
8. So what's behind Netanyahu's folly? I think makes sense if you realize his close ties with American neo-conservatives like Bill Kristol
3 replies 6 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
9. The strategy of using Congress to overthrow Presidential negotiations one doesn't like has deep roots in neo-con history: Scoop Jackson
3 replies 8 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
10. Worth remembering that neo-conservatism as foreign policy formation began in Congress as attempt to derail Nixon/Ford/Carter detente.
2 replies 6 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
11. Beyond strategy of using Congress, neo-cons like Kristol have longstanding desire to polorize USA politics on Israel.
2 replies 4 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
12. Thinking behind Kristol's advocacy seems to be that if Jewish electorate in USA sees GOP as more pro-Israel, they will move to the right
6 replies 5 retweets 5 likes
@Ali_Gharib Oh, I didn't mean this to be just an electoral strategy. But please say more.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.