2. Unless I missed something, this story isn't being widely discussed in Canadian media circles:http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/bc-mla-andrew-weaver-wins-defamation-suit-against-national-post/article22850470/ …
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
3. National Post lost lawsuit because Weaver sued, but lawsuit covers only part of paper's problem on climate.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
4. Michael Mann & other climate scientists probably also have grounds to sue Post, but they (lucky for Post) have bigger things to deal with
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
5. The fact is, the Post's coverage of climate, particularly in op ed and Financial Post is scandalously bad and dishonest.
1 reply 8 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
6. Andrew Coyne, comments editor at Post, is on record as believing science on climate isn't settled. Is receptive to denialist voices.
2 replies 6 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @SevenSharpNine
@SevenSharpNine It's wrong for Coyne to think that his politically motivated columnists know more than actual scientists.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SevenSharpNine
@SevenSharpNine Anti-intellectual to believe that scientists know more about science than journalists?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@SevenSharpNine Skepticism is only of value if it is informed. Real debate on climate is among scientists.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.